Yixing
The similar looking decorations from the same vendor still add a worrying twist of doubt to that pot… might be that they all came from the same source and decorations had been added later. Not sure. If fake, the original pot is quite a good imitation from what I can see on pictures.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
The Yixing pot look legit old or at the very least a high quality replica. Clay looks different than my pot.
The smaller CZ pot sold for way more than it should have so someone almost certainly thought it was Yixing. These normally sell for less than a $100.
The smaller CZ pot sold for way more than it should have so someone almost certainly thought it was Yixing. These normally sell for less than a $100.
I agreed that the clay looks very convincing for Mid Qing. Unless the vendor keeps posting similar things, there is a chance there is a benevolent explanation for the similar decorations. Based in the UK it could really be out of an estate sale.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:08 pmThe Yixing pot look legit old or at the very least a high quality replica. Clay looks different than my pot.
The smaller CZ pot sold for way more than it should have so someone almost certainly thought it was Yixing. These normally sell for less than a $100.
Speaking of Chaozhou and patina...
The first photo was taken after just one or two sessions.
I neglected to take a photo in its original / reset state, thinking to myself that, surely, it won't take on a shine that quickly... It was rather 'matte' when I first met it.
The second photo was taken after ten or so brews.
I really look forward to seeing how it keeps developing. And it brews yancha pretty well, too, so it's likely to see a bit of action...
@Bok: how is your 1958 biandeng developing compared to this one? Or is it too fragile for a lot of use?
Perhaps there should be a 'show off your patina' page around here.
Andrew
The first photo was taken after just one or two sessions.
I neglected to take a photo in its original / reset state, thinking to myself that, surely, it won't take on a shine that quickly... It was rather 'matte' when I first met it.
The second photo was taken after ten or so brews.
I really look forward to seeing how it keeps developing. And it brews yancha pretty well, too, so it's likely to see a bit of action...
@Bok: how is your 1958 biandeng developing compared to this one? Or is it too fragile for a lot of use?
Perhaps there should be a 'show off your patina' page around here.
Andrew
- Attachments
-
- _MG_9972.jpg (194.5 KiB) Viewed 5979 times
-
- _MG_9994.jpg (196.93 KiB) Viewed 5979 times
@Andrew S now that you mention it, that is the pot I should have take with me for CNY to give it a booster! I admit to have neglected it so far, got distracted by other pots, so it’s still relatively virgin.
Your Chaozhou on the other hand looks very promising! Fast development.
Your Chaozhou on the other hand looks very promising! Fast development.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
I finally got a NZWH pot with similar shape + era (unless I’m mistaken). I think I prefer the look of the one you posted.steanze wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 1:14 amhere is another oneChadrinkincat wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:20 pmMark-S
An example of a LQER neizhiwaihong pot.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/142937832 ... 0027295326![]()
![]()
Very nice! It's a very practical shape. What's the zini inside like? I usually find that in these ROC neiziwaihong the quality of the zini is much better than in most of the F1 versionsChadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 02, 2022 11:26 pm
I finally got a NZWH pot with similar shape + era (unless I’m mistaken). I think I prefer the look of the one you posted.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Thanks! Clay looks ok, similar to a ROC dragon pot I use to own. I just wish it was a bit smaller and higher fired.steanze wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 9:41 amVery nice! It's a very practical shape. What's the zini inside like? I usually find that in these ROC neiziwaihong the quality of the zini is much better than in most of the F1 versionsChadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 02, 2022 11:26 pm
I finally got a NZWH pot with similar shape + era (unless I’m mistaken). I think I prefer the look of the one you posted.
- Attachments
-
- 885B48E3-5FB4-44F5-8B3C-6876F5872970.jpeg (288.44 KiB) Viewed 5798 times
-
- 6D0455CB-43E0-47A6-AE56-395C8D55BF0B.jpeg (243.06 KiB) Viewed 5798 times
@Chadrinkincat
I am glad you got the pot, I was contemplating on bidding it. I had my eyes on the cannon spout shui ping pot by the same seller but got out bidded haha. Congratulations!
I am glad you got the pot, I was contemplating on bidding it. I had my eyes on the cannon spout shui ping pot by the same seller but got out bidded haha. Congratulations!
Ah, interesting, it is a quite different, lighter colored kind of zini from the one on my version.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 12:26 pm
Thanks! Clay looks ok, similar to a ROC dragon pot I use to own. I just wish it was a bit smaller and higher fired.
Those 3 hole filters are fun

-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Thanks! I was eyeing that pot too but I wasn’t willing to bid much due to the no return policy. Hopefully someone else was lucky enough to snag that one, it was the nicer of the two.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
@steanze
It is definitely a bit lighter than my other ROC zini pots. The size and filter type definitely makes this one a bit of a slow pour 20-24s. I might use it as a mini grandpa pot.
It is definitely a bit lighter than my other ROC zini pots. The size and filter type definitely makes this one a bit of a slow pour 20-24s. I might use it as a mini grandpa pot.