Bok wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 8:29 pm
Mark-S ornamented pots are not my strength, but it’s still almost impossible to judge a dirty pot. The grit can cover up a lot about the true nature of the pot.
What got me concerned is the inside of the lid, even with the dirt. Is the transition of the bottom to sides one smooth round curve or more like an edge?
Seems like some version of the squirrel grape pot…
I know... but it's "if you clean it, you keep it".

If I keep this one I'll definitely clean it. I want to be able to use it.
It's a smooth transition. Is this a good sign? The photos are a bit distorted because I had to use a mid-range smartphone to take them and the lighting wasn't good (I had to work long hours yesterday).
Yes, I got a F1 version with a damaged lid (1 squirrel is missing). I don't know if you remember.
Actually, I wanted to buy the $1000+ F1 version from ZAG but somebody bought this pot...

So I looked for other teapots with this design and found this one. I paid about $250 for it... It's now the most expensive pot in my collection.
steanze wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:48 pm
This is an interesting one. There are several features that look "correct": the base, the interior filter, the exterior of the lid, the outer edge of the underside of the lid, the upper portion of the body... yet other features look suspicious: the underside of the lid, the spout... I'd give it a ~60-65% chance of being antique, with workmanship that is a bit inconsistent for different sections, possibly made for export.
The clay looks fine to me with Mica and small black/yellow dots... The teapot also has a small hairline crack. I don't know if this is easy to fake.
The teapot seems to be waxed. What do you think of this? I've read on teachat that this is a red flag... but I've seen a green label pot with wax applied (I think it was posted in this forum)... and the seller told me that it's common. However, he was wrong about other things, so I don't trust him blindly.