And what does flower mud look like in comparison to mud with added bc? Sorry, I'm no potter.

A general rule I'd usually follow when asked about pot size is you'll need to have sufficient space for 7g of tea to unfold inside your pot. As for young sheng, I prefer a minimum of 100ml/7g of tea. If you find that 100ml is too big for you, try being 3/4 pot instead of a full pot.Janice wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:14 pmI’d like to buy an yixing pot that’s about 80 to 85 ml primarily for brewing young to middle-aged sheng. A modern pot is fine and I prefer simple shapes w/o decoration. I’ve tried reading through this thread and then looking at some of the shops that are mentioned. I end up dazed by all the conflicting claims and wide rangE of Prices.
**I need to avoid becoming a student/collector of yixing as I already have TAD** and the overflowing cabinets to prove it.
Ooh, that’s the question for the seniors!
Clay without added barium carbonate can have some signs, including darker patches/spots on the interior bottom, on the lid, or darkening around the spout tip. If clay has these signs, it is likely that no barium carbonate was added. However, pots can have no barium carbonate added and none of those signs either.
I remember reading this term on Facebook a couple of times, but I did not understand the meaning. Thanks for the explanation. Personally, I think I'd prefer flower mud, but on the seller's website it sounds more like a flaw.pantry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:43 pmOoh, that’s the question for the seniors!Mark-S wrote: ↑And what does flower mud look like in comparison to mud with added bc?
My understanding is that flower mud (just a direct translation of the term in Chinese) refers to a white patch of uneven color on the fired clay. Potters add barium carbonate to prevent that cosmetic flaws. Another way to prevent flower mud is to knead the clay more before making the pot. Something something...someone who knows what they’re talking about please chime in![]()
Welcome! Yes, well, the name is poetic, but it looks kind of like this:
Yeah, it probably should have been translated as ‘’marred mud”, as the that’s the second meaning of 花 and it makes more sense. Also because seller considers it a flaw it probably makes the pot cheaper
It's seen quite rarely, and on ROC or earlier pots... I personally don't really mind something like that, the clay processing method is more important to me
He puts the warning about possible flaws on all pots. It's more of a disclaimer than an indication that the pot exhibits them.pantry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:02 pmOoh, that’s a reasonable price! Correct me if I’m wrong, but flower mud indicates no traces of Barium Carbonate remained in the clay when made, is that right?.m. wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:43 pmHere's one that doesn't ruin the wallet:
http://2088taiwan.com//index.php?route= ... uct_id=138
After 1980 Barium. Before 1980, no Barium. Ben's research seem to strongly suggest that. Not sure when is niangao from..m. wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:55 amHe puts the warning about possible flaws on all pots. It's more of a disclaimer than an indication that the pot exhibits them.pantry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:02 pmOoh, that’s a reasonable price! Correct me if I’m wrong, but flower mud indicates no traces of Barium Carbonate remained in the clay when made, is that right?.m. wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:43 pmHere's one that doesn't ruin the wallet:
http://2088taiwan.com//index.php?route= ... uct_id=138
Not sure if Barium Carbonate has ever been added to Niangao clay. Time to do some research...
Niangao tu is only from the green label period, as far as I know.
No not exactly clear, I remember he even found and example from 1979. but after 1980 it was more common. There's really no way to tell if there's barium in the clay or not, unless it has Flower Glaze, but then it won't be sold. The clay which the potters used was made by the Central mining and processing company, not exactly F1 based on what KZ said in his video.Balthazar wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 11:11 amNiangao tu is only from the green label period, as far as I know.
Is the 1980-cutoff for barium really that clear? If green label was approximately 1977-1982, would this mean that pots from "late green label" (i.e. the last two years) contains barium whereas earlier green label did not? Or is 1980 more of an approximation?
I'd also like to know if the introduction of barium was "standardized" and rolled out among all factory potters, or if the practice gradually expanded.