@Mark-S
Looks modern to me. Maybe others can comment on it.
That blog is quit interesting, I've been following it for years.Mark-S wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:03 pmWhat do you think about this teapot? (apparently late Qing dynasty for export to the Middle East)
Is it from Yixing and what do you think about the clay? Good? Mediocre? Junk?
The picture is from this blog: http://blog.andrewbaseman.com/?tag=yixing (very interesting stuff btw)
Probably a lot more than they did for the West, I do believe that tea consumption has been and still is a lot higher there than in central Europe.
Bok wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:19 pmThat blog is quit interesting, I've been following it for years.Mark-S wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:03 pmWhat do you think about this teapot? (apparently late Qing dynasty for export to the Middle East)
Is it from Yixing and what do you think about the clay? Good? Mediocre? Junk?
The picture is from this blog: http://blog.andrewbaseman.com/?tag=yixing (very interesting stuff btw)
The pot in question is not exactly rubbish, but not something considered worthwhile collecting by many. Reasons being: The proportions are off and the workmanship is not very good, see handle for example. The clay itself is low-fired Zisha, so the effect on tea will be poor. Many in Asia avoid this kind of commoner pot clay as it performs poorly and is best suited for low-mid grade teas (in that case maybe not a bad fit for many in the West as it will match the teas available)
Any repair will lower the overall value of an antique, yet this one is done nicely and for me personally it would be a plus, but then I do have a preference for these "ugly ducklings" ...
Probably a lot more than they did for the West, I do believe that tea consumption has been and still is a lot higher there than in central Europe.
Why is that? China has been a major exporter of mass produced goods since ancient times. That said, I believe the vast majority of export to Europe and Middle East, Russia etc. has been porcelain teaware, rather than Yixing, while most parts of Asia ordered Yixing.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:30 pmExport to java, Indonesian makes more sense than the Middle East.
These types of pots are available on eBay and they often ship from Indonesia and MY.Bok wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:39 pmWhy is that? China has been a major exporter of mass produced goods since ancient times. That said, I believe the vast majority of export to Europe and Middle East, Russia etc. has been porcelain teaware, rather than Yixing, while most parts of Asia ordered Yixing.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:30 pmExport to java, Indonesian makes more sense than the Middle East.
Nice examples. Better quality than the one from Baseman.
Thanks for your estimation. The teapot would cost me $17. However, I think I will avoid it too then because of the clay. I do not know much about the quality of teas, but the tea I drink is not cheap (up to $37 for 100g). There is no better tea available here. I know you do not value teapots from the green label era, but I like them... good clay & craftmanship (in my opinion). In addition, they are often clean and not too pricy.Bok wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:19 pmThe pot in question is not exactly rubbish, but not something considered worthwhile collecting by many. Reasons being: The proportions are off and the workmanship is not very good, see handle for example. The clay itself is low-fired Zisha, so the effect on tea will be poor. Many in Asia avoid this kind of commoner pot clay as it performs poorly and is best suited for low-mid grade teas (in that case maybe not a bad fit for many in the West as it will match the teas available)
It is not a repair. It just looks like one. I found a few of these teapots online and they all look the same... more or less.
Wow, that one looks very nice! Thank you very much. I think I will buy it... Maybe I can make it shine like this one.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:30 pm
Export to java, Indonesian makes more sense than the Middle East.
Another similar pot w/ different Java seal. https://www.antiquers.com/threads/chine ... pot.34762/
If it is real and you pass on a $17 Teapot from the late Qing, then you are a fool! I doubt it can be had at that price though and be real... Even the repaired ones are still not that cheap by far!Mark-S wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:02 pmThanks for your estimation. The teapot would cost me $17. However, I think I will avoid it too then because of the clay. I do not know much about the quality of teas, but the tea I drink is not cheap (up to $37 for 100g). There is no better tea available here. I know you do not value teapots from the green label era, but I like them... good clay & craftmanship (in my opinion). In addition, they are often clean and not too pricy.
Because they are from later factory periods 80s-end mostly. The ones from the fb group only collect 50-60-70s, which are considered superior in clay and value as well. At those times there were no decorated pots, only a few standard models.Mark-S wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:02 pmMaybe you can answer me one more question:
The factory one teapots sold in Europe are often highly decorated. Is this because the Chinese did not export ordinary teapots to Europe? Are the decorated pots of better quality then the Chinese pots you find in this group en masse? https://facebook.com/groups/1429378320690167/
A lot of them break in similar places, which is why repairs can look same-ish. But yes, there was also a demand for certain fittings in SEA.
I do not have enough money to buy them all, and I like the green label pots better because of the designs.
That makes sense. However, take this seller for example: https://essenceoftea.com/collections/yixing-teapots