
I’ll check out their tea and compare it to other vendors and give my honest opinion. I expect based on responses here that they have overpriced mediocre tea. If I am pleasantly surprised I’ll make sure to spread the good word.
No idea of the quality of his teas, no desire to do business with someone who I know I can't trust which is where I'm at from patently silly claims like his 1600year tea. Sure mistakes happen but the more one is trying to pass themselves off as an expert the less leeway they get.
Hahaha Touché.pizzapotamus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:17 pmYou should listen to this guy with regards to buying what he's saying.No idea of the quality of his teas, no desire to do business with someone who I know I can't trust which is where I'm at from patently silly claims like his 1600year tea. Sure mistakes happen but the more one is trying to pass themselves off as an expert the less leeway they get.
This sums up my feelings on Mei Leaf pretty much perfectly. I haven't tried his teas, but I've seen enough incorrect information on his website and youtube to know that he is more hat than cattle.Atlas wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:43 amYou may be (and I suspect are) confusing "knowledge" with "details".
Having watched a few of his deep-dive videos and a couple of basics videos (though not for about a year):
- The enthusiasm and production values are excellent, and I can't really criticise him for his schtick just because I personally hate it.
- Many of his basic how-to videos provide, imho, excellent primers, and I think they provide a valuable service that no-one else is providing. They get people excited about tea, too, which is fantastic.
- Some of the details/theories he provides about tea, clays etc have the stink of "stuff he's been told but has never independently verified". Some of it doesn't scan given even cursory analysis (his explanation of yixing comes to mind, but as I say it's been a long while). The errors you can see make everything else suspect, if only because it makes him seem credulous.
- Newbies who can't spot the problems are generally taken in by the level of detail, because they can't vet anything and thus have to go on confidence and detail... and he has those in spades.
I can't comment personally on his teas, but that's because I've heard from people I trust who have had them that they do not live up to the expectations set by their prices. That doesn't mean you have to trust it, but it's silly to expect everyone you ask to respond with specific details of what they didn't like about particular teas in the context of a "is this vendor good?" thread.
This is a very good point and one that I believe is too often overlooked. This is even more of an issue if the vendor has the extra overhead of a brick and mortar shop.pedant wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:22 pmi tend to stereotype vendors to a certain extent based on their location.
as a US-based shopper, the UK ranks fairly high on my mental lists of perceived overhead, cost of living, import/export duty, shipping costs, and other encumbrances. this causes me to perceive their value (quality per USD) as relatively low. for comparison, i'd rank much of europe slightly better or about the same, and i'd expect australia to be worse value.
similarly, if a shop has a NYC storefront, i would also expect the value to be relatively low even though i'm in the US.
I think the general underpinnings of this line of thought are valid (more expenses = higher prices), but I'd be careful about extrapolating it too far.Dresden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:33 amThis is a very good point and one that I believe is too often overlooked. This is even more of an issue if the vendor has the extra overhead of a brick and mortar shop.pedant wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:22 pmi tend to stereotype vendors to a certain extent based on their location.
as a US-based shopper, the UK ranks fairly high on my mental lists of perceived overhead, cost of living, import/export duty, shipping costs, and other encumbrances. this causes me to perceive their value (quality per USD) as relatively low. for comparison, i'd rank much of europe slightly better or about the same, and i'd expect australia to be worse value.
similarly, if a shop has a NYC storefront, i would also expect the value to be relatively low even though i'm in the US.
I swear, London is one of a few places on this planet that can make Disney World look like a non-profit organization.
That’s ridiculous to assume tea gave your friend cancer. You have more of a chance contributing to cancer from the food you eat every day from your local grocery store.Baisao wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:27 am
A friend of mine died last year of stomach cancer and I wonder if it was because she had to sample bad teas to curate high quality teas.
You asked for an opinion and many were given: sleazy marketing practices, mediocre tea quality, misinformation, deception, etc.
Just how badly do you want to look at that t-bone?