Mark-S wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 5:04 amWhat do you think of this pot? It's too small / expensive for me but it's kind of interesting.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/193461339875
![]()
Yixing
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
@Chadrinkincat OMG, good eye! I knew that pot was way too small.
Nice to know it is in good hands.

-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:13 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
@Chadrinkincat what a nice color and texture, once cleaned. Haha that is a bit absurdly small tho...
@TeaTotaling
@TeaTotaling
- Attachments
-
- IMG_20200527_120411.jpg (237.46 KiB) Viewed 6776 times

@Chadrinkincat
11.6ml

@ChadrinkincatChadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 12:25 pmMark-S wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 5:04 amWhat do you think of this pot? It's too small / expensive for me but it's kind of interesting.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/193461339875
![]()
The clay looks so soft. Very interesting

Nice.

- TeaTotaling
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:08 pm
- Location: Ohio
@Teachronicles Thanks! Mine does appear to be different, I'll have to do further research to learn more. Have you researched the inscriptions on yours?
- Attachments
-
- 0ECBDBCE-EB9F-440B-940A-2653EC92E06F.jpeg (65.89 KiB) Viewed 6760 times
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:13 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Not much more than a pot collector friend has told me that the seal is more common in the early to mid 60s. Your seal there I believe is even earlier, 58 to early 60s. Quite a nice pot. Was this from ZAG as well? Was it on their site? I don't remember seeing it.TeaTotaling wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:40 pmTeachronicles Thanks! Mine does appear to be different, I'll have to do further research to learn more. Have you researched the inscriptions on yours?
![]()
- TeaTotaling
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:08 pm
- Location: Ohio
@Teachronicles Understood. Well that's good to know, I'll dig a little bit further to see if I can find out more. It is from them, it was on the second page of the Early Pot section, second row. I'm really looking forward to receiving it.
Usually early to mid 60s. In later 60s it's more common to see the 4 character Zhongguo Yixing seal.
This one is a hui meng chen seal. The other one is a nan meng chen seal. The nan meng chen seal is a bit rarer.TeaTotaling wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:40 pmTeachronicles Thanks! Mine does appear to be different, I'll have to do further research to learn more. Have you researched the inscriptions on yours?
![]()
- TeaTotaling
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:08 pm
- Location: Ohio
Thanks @steanze! Was Hui Meng Chen common in the late 50's, early 60's? From the pictures, the colors of the clay look noticeably different as well. Were both of these coming from the same workshop?steanze wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 3:03 pmThis one is a hui meng chen seal. The other one is a nan meng chen seal. The nan meng chen seal is a bit rarer.TeaTotaling wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:40 pmTeachronicles Thanks! Mine does appear to be different, I'll have to do further research to learn more. Have you researched the inscriptions on yours?
![]()
Yes, hui meng chen was the most common seal in that period. The clay color difference should just be lighting or staining. If not, yours looks right, the other one looks a bit too dark. F1 hongni pots from that period use the same batch of clay, a few are a bit finer ("fen tai"), but pretty similarTeaTotaling wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 3:29 pm
Thanks steanze! Was Hui Meng Chen common in the late 50's, early 60's? From the pictures, the colors of the clay look noticeably different as well. Were both of these coming from the same workshop?
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:13 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA
The bottom of my pot is a bit dirty, so probably staining, and also lighting. By finer do you mean the mesh number/how finely the clay is sieved during processing?steanze wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 3:38 pmYes, hui meng chen was the most common seal in that period. The clay color difference should just be lighting or staining. If not, yours looks right, the other one looks a bit too dark. F1 hongni pots from that period use the same batch of clay, a few are a bit finer ("fen tai"), but pretty similarTeaTotaling wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 3:29 pm
Thanks steanze! Was Hui Meng Chen common in the late 50's, early 60's? From the pictures, the colors of the clay look noticeably different as well. Were both of these coming from the same workshop?
I can only see the finished result, the grain of clay is finer on those pots. But yes, finer mesh is likely to be the cause.Teachronicles wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 4:11 pm
The bottom of my pot is a bit dirty, so probably staining, and also lighting. By finer do you mean the mesh number/how finely the clay is sieved during processing?