Site Feedback & Discussion
Thanks for your response (and for moving my comment somewhere more appropriate).
I suppose that it depends upon whether people here (that is, the admins, guided by what ordinary members think) prefer to have a 'free market of ideas' approach or a 'safe space' approach.
Obviously, the former involves less regulation, more risk, and requires each forum member or visitor to make up their own mind with due diligence and to take the risk of deceit upon themselves, whereas the latter would require more active intervention by those who control the forum (whether through their discretion, through specific rules, or both), more risk of shutting out an innocent vendor accidentally, and more risk that the forum generally or its admins specifically would be 'blamed' by someone who was in fact deceived by a vendor.
Thankfully, no one is suggesting the approach of simply banning the sale or marketing of products altogether on the forum.
My own view is that, in large measure, and in general, this forum feels like more of a community of like-minded individuals and less like the kind of free-for-all that exists elsewhere on the internet. The vendor part of the forum is somewhat different to the rest of course, being a combination of ordinary advertising and self-interest with discussion by members and occasional active participation by some, but not most, vendors.
It's all rather unhelpful to talk about it in a hypothetical sense though. It works well as it is, subject to the very occasional issues which I think are best dealt with as an aspect of admin discretion (at least at the moment, while the forum is not too big).
I will let you know if I have any potentially useful ideas. Until then, I'll go back to my tea...
Andrew
I suppose that it depends upon whether people here (that is, the admins, guided by what ordinary members think) prefer to have a 'free market of ideas' approach or a 'safe space' approach.
Obviously, the former involves less regulation, more risk, and requires each forum member or visitor to make up their own mind with due diligence and to take the risk of deceit upon themselves, whereas the latter would require more active intervention by those who control the forum (whether through their discretion, through specific rules, or both), more risk of shutting out an innocent vendor accidentally, and more risk that the forum generally or its admins specifically would be 'blamed' by someone who was in fact deceived by a vendor.
Thankfully, no one is suggesting the approach of simply banning the sale or marketing of products altogether on the forum.
My own view is that, in large measure, and in general, this forum feels like more of a community of like-minded individuals and less like the kind of free-for-all that exists elsewhere on the internet. The vendor part of the forum is somewhat different to the rest of course, being a combination of ordinary advertising and self-interest with discussion by members and occasional active participation by some, but not most, vendors.
It's all rather unhelpful to talk about it in a hypothetical sense though. It works well as it is, subject to the very occasional issues which I think are best dealt with as an aspect of admin discretion (at least at the moment, while the forum is not too big).
I will let you know if I have any potentially useful ideas. Until then, I'll go back to my tea...
Andrew
I see it similar to the admins… as annoying as it is the current case has so far done nothing obviously malicious in public, apart from posting a lot and not responding to any serious question, which could reveal his true intentions. It’s telling how he specifically avoids to reply to Taiwan based people as they could verify any of his claims very fast.
In the background I have it on good authority that offers to sell dubious(actually fake beyond doubt)teaware for exorbitant prices have been made, we are talking several K USD. So the intention is pretty clear. But so is the one of any random Taobao seller claiming to sell quality when they don’t, just that they don’t post on our forum. Luckily.
For now the forum’s auto immune Defense system seems to work well enough as to that the cloud at least makes it obvious to the innocent reader what is going on. Those who don’t read and make their homework probably don’t deserve better anyways.
In the background I have it on good authority that offers to sell dubious(actually fake beyond doubt)teaware for exorbitant prices have been made, we are talking several K USD. So the intention is pretty clear. But so is the one of any random Taobao seller claiming to sell quality when they don’t, just that they don’t post on our forum. Luckily.
For now the forum’s auto immune Defense system seems to work well enough as to that the cloud at least makes it obvious to the innocent reader what is going on. Those who don’t read and make their homework probably don’t deserve better anyways.
Last edited by Bok on Sat Dec 25, 2021 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Telemarketers do nothing malicious, they just call often. But now there are laws to limit that. At some point, a high volume of small annoyances triggers a response. Avoiding death by a thousand cuts and all that.
Also, what is posted on the forum is there for good, and that affects web searches, both text and images. It therefore influences who will be attracted to the forum, and why. It is easy and true to say that members can ignore content they do not like, but this does not address the potential long-term impacts of some behaviors becoming a recurring pattern.
I agree with @Bok's post above.
I also think it would be a good idea to merge the different topics the vendor in question has made into one, so as to keep it all in one place. Especially when the topics in question are thinly veiled attempts at marketing.
Finally, I wonder if vendor members should have a higher bar for being granted access to direct messaging than "normal" members. I haven't thought this through (and don't know if it's technically difficult to implement), but perhaps a distinction could be made between vendors that haven taken part in discussions beyond their own store and goods, and vendors that are here purely to market their stuff. This would make it impossible for the second type to contact individual members and "pray on the inexperienced" through direct messaging, so to speak. Such a distinction would necessarily be arbitrary, but I think it's gonna be a pretty clear-cut case which group a vendor member belongs to 99% of the time.
I also think it would be a good idea to merge the different topics the vendor in question has made into one, so as to keep it all in one place. Especially when the topics in question are thinly veiled attempts at marketing.
Finally, I wonder if vendor members should have a higher bar for being granted access to direct messaging than "normal" members. I haven't thought this through (and don't know if it's technically difficult to implement), but perhaps a distinction could be made between vendors that haven taken part in discussions beyond their own store and goods, and vendors that are here purely to market their stuff. This would make it impossible for the second type to contact individual members and "pray on the inexperienced" through direct messaging, so to speak. Such a distinction would necessarily be arbitrary, but I think it's gonna be a pretty clear-cut case which group a vendor member belongs to 99% of the time.
Here is another idea along the same line of thought: a vendor is allowed to send DM to a member only if that member has sent a DM to that vendor in the last 15 or 30 days or if the member has added the vendor to their friends list. In other words, vendors that are not listed as friends of a member can only participate in DM conversations initiated by the member. That might require an exception for vendor-to-vendor direct messaging, I suppose.
There are ways admin can restrict active members ability to post and DM other members. We have done this on occasion in the past with members who didn’t understand forum rules, and or just posted too many redundant empty new threads. If any TeaForum members have been contacted directly by a vendor via DM with solicitations requesting outrageous prices or otherwise -that would be breaking forum rules. Vendors are required to;
Anyone who has been DM’d with an unsolicited request from a vendor, can you let us know, so we can take appropriate action. Thanks.Vendor members should avoid (self-)promotion outside of the Community > Tea/Teaware Vendors forum area.
One topic per vendor, please. This is to keep vendor offerings and announcements centralized and to reduce clutter.
i'm spending bits of free time here and there to set up evaluation servers of discourse (free and open source) and xenforo (commercial, but not that expensive), but i'm not there yet. both seem nice in their own ways, but i need to migrate this forum to them and actually play with them to decide.pedant wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:37 pmdunno. i actually want to switch to another forum software, but i haven't had time to do the migration.
phpBB is ok, but it's just too annoying to maintain and update unless you're using it 100% unmodified/uncustomized.
like for almost every single update, nothing added on just works without modification. i have to update the theme and all of my plugins (which requires some coding since i wrote some of the plugins). i would say this is my chief complaint about phpBB. too much maintenance burden.
so, eventually this site will probably use xenforo. a few things about it annoy me, but i'm on some other sites that use it, and i honestly think it's better software from the user's perspective. more featureful, and pictures are easier to work with for example. so assuming the maintenance burden is lower (haven't verified that yet), it should be a win win.
out of the box, xenforo is way closer to what i have in mind. discourse needs more theming and customization, but if it can be done in a way that doesn't create a lot of maintenance burden, it has some cool features.
discourse is free and open source, and that's a huge plus. it's much more conceivable to migrate from discourse to something else (even xenforo) in the future for that reason. it's easy to migrate to xenforo, but it's much harder to migrate away from it. i don't think there are any migration tools to go from xenforo to open source forum software. we'd be locked in without spending a lot of time doing a custom migration.
maybe i spoke too soon. discourse appears to have an importer for xenforo. idk how good it is though.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/ ... xenforo.rb
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 4:43 pm
- Location: Kaliningrad, RU
Re xenforo vs. discourse, the latter has topical rss feeds, i.e. you could subscribe to Bok's vendor thread and be the first (at least among those who didn't care to do so) to snatch up a sweet pot. I might be able to offer a hand with mending the installation, no guarantees though, it's a long time since I last used ruby.
p.s. I don't have any skin in any of these programs, though hold some affection toward free software and tea serving spots
.
p.s. I don't have any skin in any of these programs, though hold some affection toward free software and tea serving spots
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
discourse is growing on me, but their 'pups' build/launcher system is kind of absurd. i don't think docker compose existed when they made it, though.
also, speaking of ruby... all over their website, they talk about how it's built on modern technologies and is "designed for the next 10 years of the Internet". a bit rich considering it's a rails project. not exactly forward thinking, imo![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
also, speaking of ruby... all over their website, they talk about how it's built on modern technologies and is "designed for the next 10 years of the Internet". a bit rich considering it's a rails project. not exactly forward thinking, imo
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 4:43 pm
- Location: Kaliningrad, RU
I'd beg to differ with RoR being worse positioned for a long haul. Being modern, en vogue, or technically superior is a poor proxy for ability to remain relevant in the long run. Conversely, addressing survivability, ability to adapt and related properties would include technical merits only as one ingredient out of many. Speaking of Ruby, I remember some similar aspects being explicitly discussed around a major milestone in it's evolution. I'd be more wary of www holding up for another decade.
A peculiar case in point, showing how Japanese culture is posed to withstand the test of time, http://ishimochi.com/ (totally unrelated to tech)
.
A peculiar case in point, showing how Japanese culture is posed to withstand the test of time, http://ishimochi.com/ (totally unrelated to tech)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
at this point, i really like discourse. i think it is superior to xenforo in almost every way.
it will take a while to perfect the migration and config though.
it will take a while to perfect the migration and config though.
haha. well, reddit's platform isn't a turnkey solution they bought. it's overall their own thing.
also, they're a business, so they can justify spending money on doing that. more importantly, i don't think it's even possible to scale something like phpbb, xenforo, or discourse to that size. they have a lot of traffic.
i agree though. FOSS is a plus. but in the end, it makes sense to go with the better product, and i think discourse is better. it's more featureful, easily extensible, and has an active dev community. also, i like ruby more than php.
also, they're a business, so they can justify spending money on doing that. more importantly, i don't think it's even possible to scale something like phpbb, xenforo, or discourse to that size. they have a lot of traffic.
i agree though. FOSS is a plus. but in the end, it makes sense to go with the better product, and i think discourse is better. it's more featureful, easily extensible, and has an active dev community. also, i like ruby more than php.