Ethan Kurland wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 6:03 pm
+1 mostly; however,
Whether it is a matter of ego or comfort, one may want to stop thinking of themselves a novice tea afficionado. Nonetheless, I admire how you keep the experience fresh.
This point is especially interesting; how or when would it help to think that you are towards the middle of the experience curve, or to admit that you are closing in on the further side of the spectrum? There must be angles I'm not considering.
I've reviewed three books on tea, as a proofreader, and I could critique most of the ideas in the last two, comparing them to what I already knew. One was basic but really solid, so there wasn't much to consider changing, but lots of possible additions or re-arrangements came to mind. Maybe too many; it ruined the text a bit for me because I'd have written it differently. The third was so broad and so detailed that plenty I wasn't that familiar with, but I suggested countless minor edits in the more familiar range. So what does it mean; should I reframe myself as far through a learning curve? How would that help?
I'm clear on parts of what I don't know too, or haven't experienced, maybe just not most of it, and that scope is broad and deep. It's that more than chosen functional humility that I'm referring to.
All this brings a story to mind, of a friend who helped me arrive at this endless beginner position. She makes tea, from a tea producer family (someone could know who I mean already, I mention her so often), but she won't accept that she is a tea expert. To her the older generation has experienced so much more that she can't put herself on that level, even though she has been through decades of a crazy level of exposure. If she is not a tea expert then I never will be one, no matter what exposure I encounter, which kind of seems to work well.