Reviewing a 2003 and 2004 Dayi 7542
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 10:54 pm
As chance has it I've reviewed 2003 and 2004 versions of Dayi (Taetea / Menghai) 7542 sheng pu'er versions in the last few months. One was from a Liquid Proust tasting set, the other from a local Chinatown shop.
Of course that second source raises an alarm that the version might not be genuine, and there's something to that concern. Per the shop owners they bought it at a Dayi outlet in 2004 themselves, quite a bit of the tea, so it's definitely not some type of knock-off. If you trust them, and I do. I didn't intend for it to go there but one post drifts through some discussion of reviewing how to tell if it's real (but it's definitely not a guide to identifying 7542 of that age, just a walk through some review).
Since I don't know the batch numbers of either there is a limit to tracing back to the origins. Storage input is enough of a concern that to me judging final outcome is more of an issue than sorting out cause and effect sequences, trying to isolate a starting point versus where it ended up, and why storage input worked out that way. The 2003 experienced "natural" Hong Kong storage, as presented, and the 2004 stayed where I live and that shop is, in Bangkok.
My take on natural storage is that it only relates to not controlling the environment to a set parameter level, so that it would fluctuate with seasons. Even though climate should be somewhat consistent in and around Hong Kong that would still vary a lot with specific locations. Hong Kong is much cooler than here, per my experience in visiting there a few times, and a bit less humid (but still humid), so presumably tea would age a lot slower. That's not what I experienced with those two versions though; the Liquid Proust 2003 version tasted like Liu Bao out of the gate, heavy on warm mineral towards slate or even cement block. The 2004 version stored here (Bangkok) was clean in character from the early rounds. I think air-flow contact changes a lot, but I'll skip the guessing about variable inputs here.
If longish review descriptions are of interest those follow:
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... -puer.html
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... sheng.html
I was thinking that I reviewed climate graphs in different places before, in order to back that claim that Hong Kong is less humid, but this post on all that doesn't mention Bangkok's graph:
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... ative.html
Given the consistent high relative humidity in Hong Kong (70 to 80+ % RH) that can't be higher here, but given we're in essentially the same range and it's much, much hotter it definitely comes across as more humid. I was in Hong Kong last in March of 2019 and it was quite cold, as that graph in that post shows with averages being under 20 from December through March (in C; that's 68 F or less in "freedom" degrees, as someone mentioned in a discussion recently).
Of course that second source raises an alarm that the version might not be genuine, and there's something to that concern. Per the shop owners they bought it at a Dayi outlet in 2004 themselves, quite a bit of the tea, so it's definitely not some type of knock-off. If you trust them, and I do. I didn't intend for it to go there but one post drifts through some discussion of reviewing how to tell if it's real (but it's definitely not a guide to identifying 7542 of that age, just a walk through some review).
Since I don't know the batch numbers of either there is a limit to tracing back to the origins. Storage input is enough of a concern that to me judging final outcome is more of an issue than sorting out cause and effect sequences, trying to isolate a starting point versus where it ended up, and why storage input worked out that way. The 2003 experienced "natural" Hong Kong storage, as presented, and the 2004 stayed where I live and that shop is, in Bangkok.
My take on natural storage is that it only relates to not controlling the environment to a set parameter level, so that it would fluctuate with seasons. Even though climate should be somewhat consistent in and around Hong Kong that would still vary a lot with specific locations. Hong Kong is much cooler than here, per my experience in visiting there a few times, and a bit less humid (but still humid), so presumably tea would age a lot slower. That's not what I experienced with those two versions though; the Liquid Proust 2003 version tasted like Liu Bao out of the gate, heavy on warm mineral towards slate or even cement block. The 2004 version stored here (Bangkok) was clean in character from the early rounds. I think air-flow contact changes a lot, but I'll skip the guessing about variable inputs here.
If longish review descriptions are of interest those follow:
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... -puer.html
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... sheng.html
I was thinking that I reviewed climate graphs in different places before, in order to back that claim that Hong Kong is less humid, but this post on all that doesn't mention Bangkok's graph:
http://teaintheancientworld.blogspot.co ... ative.html
Given the consistent high relative humidity in Hong Kong (70 to 80+ % RH) that can't be higher here, but given we're in essentially the same range and it's much, much hotter it definitely comes across as more humid. I was in Hong Kong last in March of 2019 and it was quite cold, as that graph in that post shows with averages being under 20 from December through March (in C; that's 68 F or less in "freedom" degrees, as someone mentioned in a discussion recently).