How does a westerner learn yixing?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:34 pm
It has recently been brought to my attention that I was scammed on almost every pot I’ve bought.
I’ve spent hours looking at pictures. All my pots look like the pics to me.
I worked with someone who is well respected in the community. Looks like that was a mistake.
So, if I can’t touch before I buy, every vendor is a liar, and it’s impossible to learn from pics alone, how do we learn?
Please excuse the obvious frustration, but I am sick with disappointment right now
update:
I have received a refund on the F1 that was proven to be fake, and the situation has been resolved amicably.
The other 2 pots are impossible to prove or disprove being that they were sold to me as modern, so anything beyond that is speculation.
It has been decided that there is enough relevant info on pots in general contained in this thread to warrant its continued existence. However, this thread also put into question the integrity of a well-respected member of the community. Again, purely through speculation. For this reason, all mention of this individual has been cleansed of the topic.
————-
Admin comments:
For clarity and transparency we are listing information for each pot discussed in this thread, plus one not posted but purchased from same vendor. Notes were gathered from the buyer’s various posts in this forum, and in a closed FaceBook group ‘Early Teapots II’ administered by Dr Chi-Lin Lu, a Yixing author and expert.
Note: What questions to ask are an important consideration when learning about yixing clay type, quality, and source. Careful inspection inside of pot is important, including; spout attachment and filter, base and where handle is attached, under the lid, stamp, and close up of clay. If paying a premium for special clay inquire where it was sourced, provenance of pot ownership, and maker.
Teapot #1
Buyer requested and received a refund from vendor on this pot.
Sold as F1 pot.
This pot was discussed in the Early Teapots II group on Facebook. The expert consensus was that this is not an F1 pot;
Dr Lu’s comment “This is not F1 pot, should be made after 90s.“
www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 670082462/
Teapot #2
Sold as Zhaozhuang zhuni.
Buyer asked if it was slip cast on this forum;
Consensus on TeaForum was that it was made by a mould.
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=249
Teapot #3
Sold as high quality modern handmade hongni.
Buyer asked if it was slip cast in Early Teapots II;
Dr Lu: “I still can’t find the sign of slip cast, my opinion prone to made by mold.”
When asked about the quality of clay used Dr Lu commented, “The color of photos look biased, if it’s real color likes the first one photo should be okay.”
www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 729964856/
Teapot #4 (not featured here)
Another F1 pot purchased from same vendor (but not posted in this thread) was identified as authentic F1 on Early Teapots II. www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 666747929/
I’ve spent hours looking at pictures. All my pots look like the pics to me.
I worked with someone who is well respected in the community. Looks like that was a mistake.
So, if I can’t touch before I buy, every vendor is a liar, and it’s impossible to learn from pics alone, how do we learn?
Please excuse the obvious frustration, but I am sick with disappointment right now
update:
I have received a refund on the F1 that was proven to be fake, and the situation has been resolved amicably.
The other 2 pots are impossible to prove or disprove being that they were sold to me as modern, so anything beyond that is speculation.
It has been decided that there is enough relevant info on pots in general contained in this thread to warrant its continued existence. However, this thread also put into question the integrity of a well-respected member of the community. Again, purely through speculation. For this reason, all mention of this individual has been cleansed of the topic.
————-
Admin comments:
For clarity and transparency we are listing information for each pot discussed in this thread, plus one not posted but purchased from same vendor. Notes were gathered from the buyer’s various posts in this forum, and in a closed FaceBook group ‘Early Teapots II’ administered by Dr Chi-Lin Lu, a Yixing author and expert.
Note: What questions to ask are an important consideration when learning about yixing clay type, quality, and source. Careful inspection inside of pot is important, including; spout attachment and filter, base and where handle is attached, under the lid, stamp, and close up of clay. If paying a premium for special clay inquire where it was sourced, provenance of pot ownership, and maker.
Teapot #1
Buyer requested and received a refund from vendor on this pot.
Sold as F1 pot.
This pot was discussed in the Early Teapots II group on Facebook. The expert consensus was that this is not an F1 pot;
Dr Lu’s comment “This is not F1 pot, should be made after 90s.“
www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 670082462/
Teapot #2
Sold as Zhaozhuang zhuni.
Buyer asked if it was slip cast on this forum;
Consensus on TeaForum was that it was made by a mould.
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=249
Teapot #3
Sold as high quality modern handmade hongni.
Buyer asked if it was slip cast in Early Teapots II;
Dr Lu: “I still can’t find the sign of slip cast, my opinion prone to made by mold.”
When asked about the quality of clay used Dr Lu commented, “The color of photos look biased, if it’s real color likes the first one photo should be okay.”
www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 729964856/
Teapot #4 (not featured here)
Another F1 pot purchased from same vendor (but not posted in this thread) was identified as authentic F1 on Early Teapots II. www.facebook.com/groups/teapot2/permali ... 666747929/