More pictures.
Yixing
- Attachments
-
- IMG_3855.jpeg (215.75 KiB) Viewed 6876 times
-
- IMG_3856.jpeg (271.82 KiB) Viewed 6876 times
-
- IMG_3863.jpeg (246.55 KiB) Viewed 6876 times
Nah! They can't be all wrong.

No, I know the dragon teapot is authentic. No need to confirm or question that. I was asking about the other teapot (viewtopic.php?p=21054#p21054). If you think that's clearly a fake I would like to hear a reason for it. If even Chinese guys think that this one is genuine it can't be that obvious, can it?
The link is not broken, but you cannot see posts of private groups I guess.

@Balthazar
I got my teapots from eBay and different sites similar to eBay. I also looked at flea markets but that did not work well. Professional auction houses are way too pricey in my opinion.
... and it's for sale again. So it's possible this set is not so good after all, and I am not the only one getting it wrong sometimes. At least I don't pay this much for my pots.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/293555391267

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/293555391267
How do you know? Authentic what? Green label? It can also be an authentic F1, but with a sticker from the wrong period for example

Pricey, or the price of what those items are worth if authentic

-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
@Mark-S
The bark on your 3friends pot looks like it is erratic and poorly done compared to mine.
The overall craftsmanship of each of mine varies slightly but none seem to stand out as being different. I think these are all authentic but than again i can’t be 100% either.
I’m not sure it’s possible for anyone to fully access your squirrel and grape pot from 1-2 pictures but at first glance it looks similar to supposed late 80’s version from FB groups. Although spout and handle seems a bit funny to me.
You can probably post your decorative pots to that other FB group and get some of their opinions.
It’s funny how some people claim F1 has consistent quality of details while others insist that these mass produced pots can have many things wrong and still be F1. I don’t have enough knowledge or experience to be certain of the validity of either side which is why I think it is wise to pursue the pots w/ better craftsmanship and just avoid the ones w/ questionable details.
The bark on your 3friends pot looks like it is erratic and poorly done compared to mine.
The overall craftsmanship of each of mine varies slightly but none seem to stand out as being different. I think these are all authentic but than again i can’t be 100% either.
I’m not sure it’s possible for anyone to fully access your squirrel and grape pot from 1-2 pictures but at first glance it looks similar to supposed late 80’s version from FB groups. Although spout and handle seems a bit funny to me.
You can probably post your decorative pots to that other FB group and get some of their opinions.
It’s funny how some people claim F1 has consistent quality of details while others insist that these mass produced pots can have many things wrong and still be F1. I don’t have enough knowledge or experience to be certain of the validity of either side which is why I think it is wise to pursue the pots w/ better craftsmanship and just avoid the ones w/ questionable details.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Mark-S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:45 am... and it's for sale again. So it's possible this set is not so good after all, and I am not the only one getting it wrong sometimes. At least I don't pay this much for my pots.![]()
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/293555391267
^^ this. In some cases names can be stamped on the base, as in the famous "ting ji" pots.OCTO wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:27 pm... but then again during the Revolution era, no names are allowed to be branded on the outer surface of the pot. If there is such a the case, the potter faces an impending death sentence. That's why you often see names, if any, under the lid where it's hidden from plain sight.
The cultural revolution era ended in 1976. Of course there are F1 pots with the name on the bottom - F1 was operational also in the '80s and '90s. Squirrel pots start being made in the '80s.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
I don’t think professional auction houses in the west even sell run of the mill damage ROC pots or 30-40yr old F1 stuff anyway.
I can't tell you if the kettle is authentic, definitely not from just one photo. Personally, i don't see anything wrong there. There are different versions of zini/QSN during the green label. Also the handles came in both styles, not that one could judge a pot from a handle.Mark-S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:38 amI was asking about the other teapot (viewtopic.php?p=21054#p21054). If you think that's clearly a fake I would like to hear a reason for it. If even Chinese guys think that this one is genuine it can't be that obvious, can it?
- Attachments
-
- 60222579_150567589323681_4409765269241593856_n.jpg (41.64 KiB) Viewed 6834 times
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
I own a couple of these but I haven’t had much luck finding info about It. These have a filter basket inside which Isn’t displayed in F1 catalogues that I’ve seen so hard to be certain what the proper configuration is for the holes..m. wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:08 amI can't tell you if the kettle is authentic, definitely not from just one photo. Personally, i don't see anything wrong there. There are different versions of zini/QSN during the green label. Also the handles came in both styles, not that one could judge a pot from a handle.Mark-S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:38 amI was asking about the other teapot (viewtopic.php?p=21054#p21054). If you think that's clearly a fake I would like to hear a reason for it. If even Chinese guys think that this one is genuine it can't be that obvious, can it?
![]()
Yeah, I noticed that too.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:57 amIt’s funny how some people claim F1 has consistent quality of details while others insist that these mass produced pots can have many things wrong and still be F1.

Thanks for your answer. After the corona crisis I will post pictures of my pots in the Facebook group. But before I do that I have to find the right setting for it so my pots don't look shitty. Product photography is much harder than I thought.
Bok wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:52 am@Bok
I know it's authentic green label because I trust the seller with his opinion.
No, I think they are just expensive because the customers have more money to spend and they don't have to look for it on eBay. For example, they sell the same stuff EoT sells for more money.
Mark-S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:38 am
No, I know the dragon teapot is authentic. No need to confirm or question that. I was asking about the other teapot (viewtopic.php?p=21054#p21054). If you think that's clearly a fake I would like to hear a reason for it. If even Chinese guys think that this one is genuine it can't be that obvious, can it?
@Mark-S
I am unable to verify the authenticity of the pot for you. These TiLiang pots are seldom sought after by collectors. But I would take a look at them if I come across one from Qing dynasty. Other than from that Era, it's not worth collecting unless you fancy the design of the pot.
As for claims made by China Mainland sellers, I would always cross reference their claims.
Cheers!!
I have 2, one big and one small, different clays, different handles, different craftsmanship, and very different baskets. Here's the bigger one (with better craftsmanship), don't have a picture of the smaller one.Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:13 amI own a couple of these but I haven’t had much luck finding info about It. These have a filter basket inside which Isn’t displayed in F1 catalogues that I’ve seen so hard to be certain what the proper configuration is for the holes..m. wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:08 amI can't tell you if the kettle is authentic, definitely not from just one photo. Personally, i don't see anything wrong there. There are different versions of zini/QSN during the green label. Also the handles came in both styles, not that one could judge a pot from a handle.Mark-S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:38 amI was asking about the other teapot (viewtopic.php?p=21054#p21054). If you think that's clearly a fake I would like to hear a reason for it. If even Chinese guys think that this one is genuine it can't be that obvious, can it?
![]()
- Attachments
-
- s-l1600 (4).jpg (160.63 KiB) Viewed 6788 times