Book: The Art of Kungfu Tea – Ruoshen Teacup

Post Reply
User avatar
sheep.payday2
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 1:54 pm
Location: Finland

Sat Dec 07, 2024 4:16 am

In conjunction with the International Antiques Fair (HK) in May 2023 there was an event focused on 若深 Ruoshen cups, with an exhibition, lectures, and a book launch《杯必若深珍藏》("The Cup Must Be Ruoshen") by the Taiwanese publisher Wushing. Wushing has put out a number of magazines related to tea culture, including the English-language "Art of Tea" that was apparently founded by Wu De of Global Tea Hut fame.

Being curious about cups and stuff, I bought the "exhibition catalog" edition "The Art of Kungfu Tea – Ruoshen Teacup" 《工夫茶: 杯必若深珍藏展》 for RMB 350, because I could not justify dropping RMB 2800+ for the hardcover version. This edition includes a couple of articles and photos of 300+ pieces of porcelain teaware, mostly cups with the occasional small plate or pot. The articles were somewhat disappointing: most are repetitive, pitches for the hardcover book, or its authors. The hardcover edition boasts 600+ pages, 26 (!) expert articles, and glossy paper that I suppose would better do justice to the photos.

The book is all in Chinese, traditional characters, which I can read. If you don't, the August 2022 issue of Tea & Tao (Global Tea Hut yet again) has a special feature on Ruoshen cups. I do not mean (nor would I be able) to do a comprehensive writeup on the topic, but I thought I'd share some takeaways from my reading.

If someone has the hardcover book, I'd very much like to see the full table of contents and hear your opinions. Also, if anyone has any (copies of copies of copies of…) cups in this style, please share!


What exactly is a Ruoshen cup? We are talking about a type of teacup that can be traced back to Minnanese tea culture during the "three reigns" of Kangxi (1661–1722), Yongzheng (1722–1735) and Qianlong (1735–1796) emperors, the heyday of Qing porcelain industry. They were produced by folk (as opposed to official) kilns for the local gentry, and are distinct from export ware aimed at the European and Japanese markets. Southeast Asia got some honest Ruoshen cups, as well as the gongfu tea culture that is in a sense encoded by the teaware.

Cups with the bottom mark "若深珍藏" (Ruoshen Collection) appear sometime in the Kangxi era, but it is not clear who or what "Ruoshen" was. Folklore has it that 李若深 Li Ruoshen was the name of a merchant or his shop who originally produced the cups. According to 翟健民 Di Jianmin in this volume, the earliest mention of them in the literature is in 1851, when Ruoshen was already a household name.

Some "Ruoshen" wares are marked 玩玉 or backdated to Chenghua or Xuande reigns of the Ming dynasty (less copies than spiritual successors to Ming blue and white porcelain). The name is spelled 若琛 Ruochen in some sources, which is a typo. At first, the Ruoshen mark seems to have been used on cups only, but other wares with the mark did appear later. Cups in the Ruoshen style were made until the early Republic period (and presumably copied later).


The chief editor 劉宏杰 Liu Hongjie's article was quite interesting. Liu writes about his experience collecting blue and white teacups between 1994–1997, starting when he was introduced to a shop in Taipei that dealt in Qing teaware. At the time, antique Yixing teapots were already selling like very expensive hot cakes, but few collectors were interested in porcelain teaware. Liu could thus afford to take his pick of the nicest, earliest, Jingdezhen-made cups as shipments arrived from the mainland.

Apparently, most of the shop's stock was unearthed from Qing tombs in 漳浦縣 Zhangpu County in the 1980s and 1990s and shipped to be sold in Taiwan, because there was no expertise or interest left in the mainland. Liu estimates that about 30% of the cups he saw were top-quality wares made in Jingdezhen, while the other 70% came from local Zhangpu kilns (漳州東溪窯) or from Dehua. The Zhangpu and Dehua cups in particular arrived in the hundreds and flew completely below the collectors' radar at that time, selling for NTD 200–300 per piece (in Liu's opinion, a ridiculous price; I haven't got an idea what money was worth then).


While it is barely mentioned in this edition of the book, in July 1990 a gongfu tea set was discovered in Zhangpu in the tomb of 藍國威 Lan Guowei (d. 1758, or Qianlong 23), including four Ruoshen cups (as well as some properly aged tea). It looks like the items are held in Zhangpu County Museum.

I'm attaching photos from the hardcover version, pilfered from the Chinese internet (source), although the quality is not great. In addition, here is Lan Guowei's pot ( and archived).
267430635_4_2023060911031169_wm.png
267430635_4_2023060911031169_wm.png (355.24 KiB) Viewed 1766 times
267430635_6_2023060911031269_wm.png
267430635_6_2023060911031269_wm.png (371.27 KiB) Viewed 1766 times

What are the characteristics of Jingdezhen-made Ruoshen cups from Kangxi to Qianlong? The cups are small (20–45 ml), thin at the lip, and thick at the bottom. We have already touched on the variety of bottom markings. The blue decoration is closer to Chinese painting than the "lavish" European or "tender-feminine" Japanese export porcelains.

The early cups present a pale blue glaze, that owes to the presence of bivalent (aka. ferrous) iron (Fe2+) in the glaze that turns blue in the reducing atmosphere of the kiln. In the Jiaqing and Daoguang reigns, improved (??) processing gradually resulted in a pure white glaze.

The typical Ruoshen glaze should have a glassy glow and hand feel. Any pinholes are small and deep. Liu describes the glazes at some length, which I think is of limited value because to really know you need to have held the object in your hands. All I can do is to post this approximation of the colour (source: https://color-term.com),
hushuilan-b0d5df.png
hushuilan-b0d5df.png (33.87 KiB) Viewed 1766 times
User avatar
sheep.payday2
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 1:54 pm
Location: Finland

Sat Dec 07, 2024 4:21 am

Here are some random cups from the catalog. The paper is matte, unfortunately resulting in a grainy appearance. There is not much daylight at my place at this time of the year.

Kangxi cups with a visible blue glow.
051.jpg
051.jpg (192.39 KiB) Viewed 1764 times
Yongzheng, the left one has a Ruoshen mark.
139-140.jpg
139-140.jpg (217.54 KiB) Viewed 1764 times
Qianlong. I assume from the context that all the items in the exhibition represent Jingdezhen, but the book is not telling me.
175.jpg
175.jpg (212.72 KiB) Viewed 1764 times
Finally, some LQER period rice grains.
304-305.jpg
304-305.jpg (211.68 KiB) Viewed 1764 times
User avatar
Bok
Vendor
Posts: 5829
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:55 am
Location: Taiwan

Tue Dec 10, 2024 5:19 am

I flicked through the hardcover at my friend's place. A loooooot if pictures which show great details – to me it also showed that I dislike white and blue porcelain too much to buy a book full of them. Information will always be scant on these, they do not want to give away too many hints to the forgers... same goes for their Yixing books.

What struck me is how perfect some really old cups can look like, as a consequence it is very humbling to see how very very difficult it is to date and authenticate old porcelain. Especially the high end stuff is spotless and truly imperial in standard. Quite unlike the low end stuff with which the markets are flooded, fake and real alike.

Prices for ruoshen cups did surge a lot in the months preceding the launch of this book... merchants and collectors correctly anticipating a higher demand after it :)
User avatar
sheep.payday2
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2023 1:54 pm
Location: Finland

Mon Dec 23, 2024 1:49 pm

Hi Bok! Uh-huh, I can imagine forgers busy stoking their kilns with redoubled vigor since the book came out. :roll: I suppose anyone who really wants to study the photos should be prepared to invest in the hardcover. The print quality in the catalog (on matte paper) is less than great.

While I don't have a problem with blue and white porcelain, I'm even more fascinated with what might be called the social history and epistemology of teaware (or any other category of collectibles): questions such as how people argue for the authenticity (or not) of a piece, or how some objects are construed as more desirable than others at a given time and place. (The quest for truth is more interesting than the truth about any particular object.) This is also why I enjoyed Liu Hongjie's contribution and his personal memories of the collector market.
Post Reply