Is this a 70s pot?
Thanks...
DIrt is obviously from storage, but if it was stored with the lid on, then I guess its quite possible that the inside will be clean...
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Handle, bottom rim and lid look off. It doesn't look naturally dirty either. I could be wrong but it looks fake to me.
Handle is too thick right?Chadrinkincat wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:14 amHandle, bottom rim and lid don't look F1. Could be wrong but it looks fake to me.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:02 am
- Location: Germany
I am far from an expert, but i have serious doubts about that pot being F1, and especially from that period. Workmanship seems wrong (Lid and Spout), and also very strange white substance making it difficult to see the clay.
But i might be wrong.
But i might be wrong.
Thanks. I saw very little pots from this sticker period and therefore not sure about all these details.theredbaron wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:26 amI am far from an expert, but i have serious doubts about that pot being F1, and especially from that period. Workmanship seems wrong (Lid and Spout), and also very strange white substance making it difficult to see the clay.
But i might be wrong.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
A number of pots from Japanese auctions are covered in white mystery dirt like this one. They're usually the ones that don't sell.
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:16 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
When this story of faking stickers actually started?
Were these pots also considered valuable in the 70s? were there a lot of fakes back then too?
or is it a new thing?