The fact is that I can experience extreme differences depending on teaware for the same tea to the point they taste like different teas at vastly different quality ranges.faj wrote: ↑Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:12 pmThat post states that teaware is (in the author's opinion) the least cost effective way to improve tea. This does not mean that the impact on tea is negligible, but rather that it is cheaper to improve by first getting better water, better tea, and learning how to brew the tea. It says "[the impact of teaware is] not that obvious if you're newer to tea", which implies that if you are more experience the effect can be obvious. It says teaware is expensive and unpredictable, which seems fair to me (the effect can be obvious... and bad).LeoFox wrote: ↑Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:52 amI think the general advice along this line is that teaware has marginal impact.
http://www.marshaln.com/2009/04/friday-april-24-2009/
Take the analogy of sport equipment. I am not going to become a high-performance cyclist buy purchasing a, expensive, high-performance bicycle. I can buy all the bicycles I want and hop from one to the other, it will not make me climb hills fast. But to a trained athlete, equipment is something to be paid attention to, because the small extra it bring can make a meaningful difference.
Additionally, this is the quote:
This is how I am reading it: He is not implying that it is marginal only for neophytes. He is implying that it is marginal and then this marginal impact is only really noticeable if you are experienced. For me, it is no where close to marginal. It is huge.The benefits (if any) they offer are usually marginal, and not that obvious if you’re newer to tea